4.7 Article

Ticagrelor Effects on Myocardial Infarction and the Impact of Event Adjudication in the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) Trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 63, 期 15, 页码 1493-1499

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.038

关键词

acute coronary syndrome(s); adjudication; clinical events committee; clopidogrel; myocardial infarction; outcomes; ticagrelor

资金

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Merck Co., Inc.
  3. GlaxoSmithKline
  4. Roche
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  6. Eli Lilly and Company
  7. Terumo Inc.
  8. Medtronic
  9. Vascular Solutions
  10. Pfizer Inc.
  11. Sanofi-Aventis
  12. NYU School of Medicine
  13. Servier
  14. Amarin
  15. Astellas
  16. Bayer HealthCare
  17. Boehringer Ingelheim
  18. Daiichi Sankyo
  19. Novartis
  20. Otsuka
  21. Medicines Company
  22. Vivus
  23. Accumetrics
  24. CSL Behring
  25. Essentialis
  26. Regeneron
  27. Takeda
  28. Eli Lilly and Company/Daiichi Sankyo
  29. Schering-Plough/Merck Co., Inc.
  30. Johnson and Johnson
  31. Boston Scientific
  32. Menarini
  33. Sorin Medica
  34. BristolMyers Squibb/Pfizer Inc.
  35. Portola Pharmaceuticals
  36. SanofiAventis
  37. Regado Biosciences
  38. Evolva
  39. Athera Biotechnologies
  40. Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives This study sought to report the treatment effect of ticagrelor on myocardial infarction (MI) and the strategy for and impact of event adjudication in the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial. Background In PLATO, ticagrelor reduced cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Methods A CIinical events committee (CEC) prospectively defined and adjudicated all suspected MI events, on the basis of events reported by investigators and by triggers on biomarkers. Treatment comparisons used CEC-adjudicated data, and per protocol, exCIuded silent MI. Results Overall, 1,299 (610 ticagrelor, 689 CIopidogrel) MIs reported by the CEC occurred during the trial. Of these, 1,097 (504 ticagrelor, 593 CIopidogrel) contributed to the primary composite endpoint. Site investigators reported 1,198 (580 ticagrelor, 618 CIopidogrel) MIs. Ticagrelor significantly reduced overall MI rates (12-month CEC-adjudicated Kaplan-Meier rates: 5.8% ticagrelor, 6.9% CIopidogrel; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75 to 0.95). Nonprocedural MI (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.74 to 1.01) and MI related to percutaneous coronary intervention or stent thrombosis tended to be lower with ticagrelor. MIs related to coronary artery bypass graft surgery were few, but numerical excess was observed in patients assigned ticagrelor. Analyses of overall MIs using investigator-reported data showed similar results but did not reach statistical significance (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.78 to 1.00). ConCIusions In patients with ACS, ticagrelor significantly reduced the incidence of MI compared with CIopidogrel, with consistent results across most MI subtypes. CEC procedures identified more MI endpoints compared with site investigators. (A Comparison of Ticagrelor [AZD6140] and CIopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome [PLATO]; NCT00391872) (C) 2014 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据