4.7 Article

The Prevalence, Incidence, Progression, and Risks of Aortic Valve Sclerosis A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 63, 期 25, 页码 2852-2861

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.018

关键词

aortic valve sclerosis; aortic valve stenosis; epidemiology; heart valve diseases; meta-analysis; systematic review

资金

  1. Tony Hocken Scholarship (Department of Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand)
  2. Cancer Research Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives The aim of this study was to comprehensively review the epidemiology of aortic sclerosis (ASc) and its association with cardiovascular events. Background ASc, which is defined as thickening or calcification of the aortic valve without significant obstruction of blood flow, is a common finding on cardiac imaging. Methods We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to April 2013 for studies describing the epidemiology of ASc and performed a meta-analysis of the risk of adverse events using a random effects model. Results Twenty-two studies were identified from the systematic review. The prevalence of ASc increased in proportion to the average age of study participants, ranging from 9% in a study in which the mean age was 54 years to 42% in a study in which the mean age was 81 years. In total, 1.8% to 1.9% of participants with ASc had progression to clinical aortic stenosis per year. There was a 68% increased risk of coronary events in subjects with ASc (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31 to 2.15), a 27% increased risk of stroke (HR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.60), a 69% increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.32 to 2.15), and a 36% increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.59). Conclusions ASc is a common finding that is more prevalent with older age. Despite low rates of progression to ASc, there is an independent increase in morbidity and mortality associated with the condition. (C) 2014 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据