4.7 Article

Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Diagnosis of Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 61, 期 23, 页码 2374-2382

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.092

关键词

cardiac imaging; diagnosis; endocarditis; positron emission tomography; prosthetic valve

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives This study sought to determine the value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-18-FDG PET/CT) for diagnosing prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE). Background The diagnosis of PVE remains challenging. In PVE cases, initial echocardiography is normal or inconclusive in almost 30%, leading to a decreased diagnostic accuracy for the modified Duke criteria. Methods We prospectively studied 72 consecutive patients suspected of having PVE. All of the patients were subjected to clinical, microbiological, and echocardiographic evaluation. Cardiac PET/CT was performed at admission. The final diagnosis was defined according to the clinical and/or pathological modified Duke criteria determined during a 3-month follow-up. Results Thirty-six patients (50%) exhibited abnormal FDG uptake around the site of the prosthetic valve. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and global accuracy were as follows (95% confidence interval): 73% (54% to 87%), 80% (56% to 93%), 85% (64% to 95%), 67% (45% to 84%), and 76% (63% to 86%), respectively. Adding abnormal FDG uptake around the prosthetic valve as a new major criterion significantly increased the sensitivity of the modified Duke criteria at admission (70% [52% to 83%] vs. 97% [83% to 99%], p = 0.008). This result was due to a significant reduction (p < 0.0001) in the number of possible PVE cases from 40 (56%) to 23 (32%). Conclusions The use of F-18-FDG PET/CT was helpful for diagnosing PVE. The results of this study support the addition of abnormal FDG uptake as a novel major criterion for PVE. (C) 2013 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据