4.7 Article

Pre-Diabetes and the Risk for Cardiovascular Disease A Systematic Review of the Evidence

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 55, 期 13, 页码 1310-1317

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.060

关键词

cardiovascular diseases; coronary heart disease; hyperglycemia; meta-analysis; prediabetic state; review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives Our objective was to estimate the magnitude of the relative risk (RR) for cardiovascular disease associated with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) from published prospective observational studies. Background Hyperglycemia is a known risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, the magnitude of the RR for cardiovascular disease associated with IFG and IGT is unclear. Methods We searched PubMed from 1997 through 2008 for relevant publications and performed a meta-analysis. Results In 18 publications with information about IFG (110 to 125 mg/dl) (IFG 110), estimates of RR ranged from 0.65 to 2.50. The fixed-effects summary estimate of RR was 1.20 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12 to 1.28). In 8 publications with information about IFG (100 to 125 mg/dl) (IFG 100), estimates of RR ranged from 0.87 to 1.40. The fixed-effects summary estimate of RR was 1.18 (95% CI: 1.09 to 1.28). In 8 publications with information about IGT, estimates of RR ranged from 0.83 to 1.34. The fixed-effects summary estimate of RR was 1.20 (95% CI: 1.07 to 1.34). Five studies combined IFG and IGT, yielding a fixed-effects summary estimate of RR of 1.10 (95% CI: 0.99 to 1.23). No significant difference between the summary estimates for men and women were detected (IFG 110: men: 1.17 [95% CI: 1.05 to 1.31], women: 1.30 [95% CI: 1.10 to 1.54]; IFG 100: men: 1.23 [95% CI: 1.06 to 1.42], women: 1.16 [95% CI: 0.99 to 1.36]). Conclusions Impaired fasting glucose and IGT are associated with modest increases in the risk for cardiovascular disease. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55: 1310-7) (C) 2010 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据