4.7 Article

Occurrence and frequency of arrhythmias in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy on relation to delayed enhancement on cardiovascular magnetic resonance

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 51, 期 14, 页码 1369-1374

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.11.071

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives Our aim was to determine whether myocardial fibrosis, detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), represents an arrhythmogenic substrate in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Background Myocardial fibrosis is identified frequently in HCM; however, the clinical significance of this finding is uncertain. Methods We studied prevalence and frequency of tachyarrhythmias on 24-h ambulatory Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) with regard to delayed enhancement (DE) on contrast-enhanced CMR in 177 HCM patients (age 41 +/- 16 yrs; 95% asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic). Results Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs), couplets, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) were more common in patients with DE than those without DE (PVCs: 89% vs. 72%; couplets: 40% vs. 17%; NSVT: 28% vs. 4%; p < 0.0001 to 0.007). Patients with DE also had greater numbers of PVCs (202 +/- 655 vs. 116 +/- 435), couplets (1.9 +/- 5 vs. 1.2 +/- 10), and NSVT runs (0.4 +/- 0.8 vs. 0.06 +/- 0.4) than non-DE patients (all p < 0.0001); DE was an independent predictor of NSVT (relative risk 7.3, 95% confidence interval 2.6 to 20.4; p < 0.0001). However, extent (%) of DE was similar in patients with and without PVCs (8.2% vs. 9.1%; p = 0.93), couplets (8.5% vs. 8.4%; p = 0.99), or NSVT (8.3% vs. 8.5%; p = 0.35). Conclusions In this large HCM cohort with no or only mild symptoms, myocardial fibrosis detected by CMR was associated with greater likelihood and increased frequency of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (including NSVT) on ambulatory Holter ECG. Therefore, contrast-enhanced CMR identifies HCM patients with increased susceptibility to ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据