4.8 Article

How Surface Potential Determines the Kinetics of the First Hole Transfer of Photocatalytic Water Oxidation

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 136, 期 30, 页码 10632-10639

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja503603k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research under AFOSR [FA9550-12-1-0337]
  2. Department of Energy Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under the CPIMS program [KC030102, CH12CUK1]
  3. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interfacial hole transfer between n-SrTiO3 and OH- was investigated by surface sensitive transient optical spectroscopy of an in situ photoelectrochemical cell during water oxidation. The kinetics reveal a single rate constant with an exponential dependence on the surface hole potential, spanning time scales from 3 ns to 8 ps over a approximate to 1 V increase. A voltage- and laser illumination-induced process moves the valence band edge at the n-type semiconductor/water interface to continuously change the surface hole potential. This single step of the water oxidation reaction is assigned to the first hole transfer h(+) + OH- -> OH center dot. The kinetics quantify how much a change in the free energy difference driving this first hole transfer reduces the activation barrier. They are also used to extrapolate the kinetic rate due to the activation barrier when that free energy difference is zero, or the Nernstian potential. This is the first time transient spectroscopy has enabled the separation of the first hole transfer from the full four hole transfer cycle and a direct determination of these two quantities. The Nernstian potential for OH-/OH center dot is also suggested, in rough agreement with gas-phase studies. The observation of a distinct, much longer time scale upon picosecond hole transfer to OH- suggests that a dominant, more stable intermediate of the water oxidation reaction, possibly a surface bound oxo, may result.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据