4.8 Article

Quantifying Transient Interactions between Bacillus Phosphatidylinositol-Specific Phospholipase-C and Phosphatidylcholine-Rich Vesicles

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 137, 期 1, 页码 14-17

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja508631n

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS of the NIH [R01GM060418]
  2. Norwegian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacillus thuringiensis secretes the virulence factor phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (BtPI-PLC), which specifically binds to phosphatidylcholine (PC) and cleaves GPI-anchored proteins off eukaryotic plasma membranes. To elucidate how BtPI-PLC searches for GPI-anchored proteins on the membrane surface, we measured residence times of single fluorescently labeled proteins on PC-rich small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs). BtPI-PLC interactions with the SUV surface are transient with a lifetime of 379 +/- 49 ms. These data also suggest that BtPI-PLC does not directly sense curvature, but rather prefers to bind to the numerous lipid packing defects in SUVs. Despite this preference for defects, all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of BtPI-PLC interacting with PC-rich bilayers show that the protein is shallowly anchored with the deepest insertions similar to 18 angstrom above the bilayer center. Membrane partitioning is mediated, on average, by 41 hydrophobic, 8 hydrogen-bonding, and 2 cation-p (between PC choline headgroups and Tyr residues) transient interactions with phospholipids. These results lead to a quantitative model for BtPI-PLC interactions with cell membranes where protein binding is mediated by lipid packing defects, possibly near GPI-anchored proteins, and the protein diffuses on the membrane for similar to 100-380 ms, during which time it may cleave similar to 10 GPI-anchored proteins before dissociating. This combination of short two-dimensional scoots followed by three-dimensional hops may be an efficient search strategy on two-dimensional surfaces with obstacles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据