4.8 Article

An Interface-Directed Coassembly Approach To Synthesize Uniform Large-Pore Mesoporous Silica Spheres

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 136, 期 5, 页码 1884-1892

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja4099356

关键词

-

资金

  1. State Key 973 Program of PRC [2013CB934104, 2012CB224805]
  2. NSF of China [21073040, 51372041]
  3. specialized research fund for the doctoral program of higher education of China [20120071110007]
  4. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [13ZZ004]
  5. Shanghai Rising Star Project of STCSM [12QH1400300]
  6. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0123]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A facile and controllable interface-directed coassembly (IDCA) approach is developed for the first time to synthesize uniform discrete mesoporous silica particles with a large pore size (ca. 8 nm) by using 3-dimensional macroporous carbon (3DOMC) as the nanoreactor for the confined coassembly of template molecules and silica source. By controlling the amount of the precursor solution and using Pluronic templates with different compositions, we can synthesize mesoporous silica particles with diverse morphologies (spheres, hollow spheres, and hemispheres) and different mesostructure (e.g., 2-D hexagonal and 3D face centered cubic symmetry), high surface area of about 790 m(2)/g, and large pore volume (0.98 cm(3)/g). The particle size can be tunable from submicrometer to micrometer regimes by changing the macropore diameter of 3DOMC. Importantly, this synthesis concept can be extended to fabricate multifunctional mesoporous composite spheres with a magnetic core and a mesoporous silica shell, large saturated magnetization (23.5 emu/g), and high surface area (280 m(2)/g). With the use of the magnetic mesoporous silica spheres as a magnetically recyclable absorbent, a fast and efficient removal of microcystin from water is achieved, and they can be recycled for 10 times without a significant decrease of removal efficiency for microcystin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据