4.8 Article

Effects of Electron Trapping and Protonation on the Efficiency of Water-Splitting Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 136, 期 31, 页码 10974-10982

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja5040705

关键词

-

资金

  1. Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Energy Biosciences, Department of Energy [DE-FG02-07ER15911]
  2. National Science Foundation [DGE1255832]
  3. Pennsylvania State University Materials Research Institute Nanofabrication Laboratory under National Science Foundation [ECS-0335765]
  4. Division Of Graduate Education
  5. Direct For Education and Human Resources [0947962] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water-splitting dye-sensitized photoelectrochemical (WS-DSPECs) cells employ molecular sensitizers to absorb light and transport holes across the TiO2 surface to colloidal or molecular water oxidation catalysts. As hole diffusion occurs along the surface, electrons are transported through the mesoporous TiO2 film. In this paper we report the effects of electron trapping and protonation in the TiO2 film on the dynamics of electron and hole transport in WS-DSPECs. When the sensitizer bis(2,2'-bipyridine)(4,4'-diphosphonato-2,2'-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) is adsorbed from aqueous acid instead of from ethanol, there is more rapid hole transfer between photo-oxidized sensitizer molecules that are adsorbed from strong acid. However, the photocurrent and open-circuit photovoltage are dramatically lower with sensitizers adsorbed from acid because intercalated protons charge-compensate electron traps in the TiO2 film. Kinetic modeling of the photocurrent shows that electron trapping is responsible for the rapid electrode polarization that is observed in all WS-DSPECs. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy suggests that proton intercalation also plays an important role in the slow degradation of WS-DSPECs, which generate protons at the anode as water is oxidized to oxygen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据