4.8 Article

Synthetic Control of Retinal Photochemistry and Photophysics in Solution

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 136, 期 6, 页码 2650-2658

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja4121814

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC
  2. Career Acceleration Fellowships [EP/H003541/1, EP/H003711/1]
  3. [EP/K006630/1]
  4. EPSRC [EP/K006630/1, EP/H003711/1, EP/H003541/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H003541/1, EP/K006630/1, EP/H003711/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding how molecular structure and environment control energy flow in molecules is a requirement for the efficient design of tailor-made photochemistry. Here, we investigate the tunability of the photochemical and photophysical properties of the retinal-protonated Schiff base chromophore in solution. Replacing the n-butylamine Schiff base normally chosen to mimic the saturated linkage found in nature by aromatic amines results in the reproduction of the opsin shift and complete suppression of all isomerization channels. Modification of retinal by directed addition or removal of backbone substituents tunes the overall photoisomerization yield from 0 to 0.55 and the excited state lifetime from 0.4 to 7 ps and activates previously inaccessible reaction channels to form 7-cis and 13-cis products. We observed a clear correlation between the presence of polarizable backbone substituents and photochemical reactivity. Structural changes that increase reaction speed were found to decrease quantum yields, and vice versa, so that excited state lifetime and efficiency are inversely correlated in contrast to the trends observed when comparing retinal photochemistry in protein and solution environments. Our results suggest a simple model where backbone modifications and Schiff base substituents control barrier heights on the excited-state potential energy surface and therefore determine speed, product distribution, and overall yield of the photochemical process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据