4.8 Article

Mechanisms of Hydride Abstractions by Quinones

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 136, 期 39, 页码 13863-13873

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja507598y

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 749]
  2. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The kinetics of the hydride abstractions by 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-p-benzoquinone (DDQ) from 13 C-H hydride donors (acyclic 1,4-dienes, cyclohexa-1,4-dienes, dihydropyridines), tributylstannane, triphenylstannane, and five borane complexes (amine-boranes, carbene-boranes) have been studied photometrically in dichloromethane solution at 20 degrees C. Analysis of the resulting second-order rate constants by the correlation log k(2)(20 degrees C) = s(N)(E + N) (J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9500) showed that the hydride abstractions from the C-H donors on one side and the Sn-H and B-H hydride donors on the other follow separate correlations indicating different mechanisms for the two reaction series. The interpretation that the C-H donors transfer hydrogen to the carbonyl oxygen of DDQ while Sn-H and B-H hydride donors transfer hydride to a cyano-substituted carbon of DDQ is supported by quantum-chemical intrinsic reaction coordinate calculations and isotope labeling experiments of the reactions of D-8-cyclohexa-1,4-diene, Bu3SnD, and pyridine BD3 with 2,5-dichloro-p-benzoquinone. The second-order rate constants of the reactions of tributylstannane with different quinones correlate linearly with the electrophilicity parameters E of the quinones, which have previously been derived from the reaction of quinones with pi-nucleophiles. The fact that the reaction of Bu3SnH with quinones and benzhydrylium ions are on the same log k(2) vs E (electrophilicity) correlation shows that both reaction series proceed by the same mechanism and illustrates the general significance of the reactivity parameters E, N, and s(N) for predicting rates of polar organic reactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据