4.8 Article

Rational Design of Helical Nanotubes from Self-Assembly of Coiled-Coil Lock Washers

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 135, 期 41, 页码 15565-15578

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja4074529

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [CHE-1012620, 0923395, CHE-0131013]
  2. Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-ER15377]
  3. Emory University, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
  4. Center for AIDS Research at Emory University [P30 AI050409]
  5. Georgia Research Alliance
  6. US DOE Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Material Sciences [W-31-109-Eng-38]
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences
  8. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [0923395] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  10. Division Of Chemistry [1012620] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Design of a structurally defined helical assembly is described that involves recoding of the amino acid sequence of peptide GCN4-pAA. In solution and the crystalline state, GCN4-pAA adopts a 7-helix bundle structure that resembles a supramolecular lock washer. Structurally informed mutagenesis of the sequence of GCN4-pAA afforded peptide 7HSAP1, which undergoes self-association into a nanotube via noncovalent interactions between complementary interfaces of the coiled-coil lock-washer structures. Biophysical measurements conducted in solution and the solid state over multiple length scales of structural hierarchy are consistent with self-assembly of nanotube structures derived from 7-helix bundle subunits. The dimensions of the supramolecular assemblies are similar to those observed in the crystal structure of GCN4-pAA. Fluorescence studies of the interaction of 7HSAP1 with the solvatochromic fluorophore PRODAN indicated that the nanotubes could encapsulate shape-appropriate small molecules with high binding affinity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据