4.8 Article

Neighboring-Cation Substitution Tuning of Photoluminescence by Remote-Controlled Activator in Phosphor Lattice

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 135, 期 34, 页码 12504-12507

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja404510v

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Council of the Republic of China, Taiwan [NSC 101-2113-M-002-014-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Highly efficient red phosphors with superior intrinsic properties that are excited by ultraviolet or blue light-emitting diodes are important white light sources for our daily life. Nitride-based phosphors, such as Sr2Si3N8:Eu2+ and CaAlSiN3:Eu2+, are commonly more red-shifted in photoluminescence and have better thermal/chemical stability than oxides. Cation substitutions are usually performed to optimize photoluminescence and thermal quenching behavior. However, the underlying mechanisms are unclear in most cases. Here we show that neighboring-cation substitution systematically controls temperature-dependent photoluminescence behavior in CaAlSiN3:Eu2+ lattice. Trivalent cation substitution at the Ca2+ site degrades the photoluminescence in high-temperature environments but achieves better thermal stability when the substituted cation turns monovalent. The neighboring-cation control of lifetime decay is also observed. A remote control effect that guides Eu2+ activators in selective Ca2+ sites is proposed for neighboring-cation substitution while the compositional Si4+/Al3+ ratio adjusts to the valence of Mn+ (n = 1-3) cation. In the remote control effect, the Eu2+ activators are surrounded with nitride anions which neighbor with M3+-dominant and Si4+/Al3+-equivalent coordination when M is trivalent, but shift to the site where surrounded nitride anions neighbor with M+-dominant and Si-rich coordination when M is monovalent. This mechanism can efficiently tune optical properties, especially thermal stability, and could be general to luminescent materials, which are sensitive to valence variation in local environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据