4.8 Article

DNAzyme Footprinting: Detecting Protein-Aptamer Complexation on Surfaces by Blocking DNAzyme Cleavage Activity

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 135, 期 6, 页码 2072-2075

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja311367t

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [2RO1 GM059622]
  2. University of California Cancer Research Coordinating Committee (CRCC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel method to quantitatively measure the binding of proteins to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) aptamers that employs the inhibition of the DNAzyme hydrolysis of aptamer monolayers is described. A 28-base DNAzyme was designed to specifically bind to and cleave a 29-base ssDNA sequence that can fold into a G-quartet aptamer and bind the protein thrombin. The binding strength of the DNAzyme to the aptamer sequence was designed to be less than the binding strength of the thrombin to the aptamer (Delta G degrees = -43.1 and -51.8 kJ/mol, respectively). Formation of the thrombin aptamer complex was found to block DNAzyme cleavage activity both in solution and in an ssDNA aptamer monolayer. We denote this method for detecting protein aptamer complexation as DNAzyme footprinting in analogy to the process of DNase footprinting for the detection of protein-DNA interactions. By attaching a 40-base reporter sequence to the ssDNA aptamer monolayer, the detection of any protein-aptamer complexes remaining on the surface after DNAzyme activity can be greatly enhanced (down to one thrombin-aptamer complex per 10 000 ssDNA molecules corresponding to 100 fM thrombin in solution) by a subsequent surface RNA transcription amplification reaction followed by RNA detection with nanoparticle-enhanced SPR imaging. In addition to RNA transcription, DNAzyme footprinting can be coupled to a wide variety of other nucleic acid surface amplification schemes and thus is a powerful new route for the enzymatically amplified detection of proteins via protein aptamer complex formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据