4.8 Article

Restricted State Selection in Fluorescent Protein Forster Resonance Energy Transfer

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 135, 期 21, 页码 7883-7890

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja312230b

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC
  2. UCL
  3. Cancer Research UK
  4. CoMPLEX Doctoral Training Centre at UCL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The measurement of donor lifetime modification by Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) is a widely used tool for detecting protein protein interactions and protein conformation change. Such measurements can be compromised by the presence of a significant noninteracting fraction of molecules. Combining time resolved intensity and anisotropy measurements gives access to both molecular distance and orientation. Fluorescent proteins frequently used to detect energy transfer in biological systems often exhibit decay characteristics indicative of more than one excited state. However, little attention has thus far been given to the specific modes of energy transfer, in particular, which states are predominantly coupled. Here, we use a previously characterized dimerization system to study energy transfer between EGFP and mCherry. Optically excited EGFP and mCherry both exhibit biexponential decays, and FRET should therefore involve dipole dipole transfer between these four states. Analysis of the sensitized fluorescence anisotropy and intensity decays indicates that FRET transfer is predominantly from the shorter lived EGFP emitting state (2.43 ns) to the longer lived (ca. 277 ns) minority component (ca. 16%) of the optically excited mCherry emission. This high degree of state selection between these two widely used FRET pairs highlights the fundamental differences that can arise between direct optical excitation of an isotropic molecular population and dipole dipole coupling in a far from isotropic interaction geometry and has consequences regarding the accurate interpretation of fluorescent protein FRET data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据