4.8 Article

Stereochemical Inversion of a Cyano-Stabilized Grignard Reagent: Remarkable Effects of the Ethereal Solvent Structure and Concentration

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 135, 期 38, 页码 14390-14400

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja407348s

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-075006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chiral organometallic reagents are useful in asymmetric synthesis, and configurational stability of these species is critical to success. In this study we followed the epimerization of a chiral Grignard reagent, prepared by Mg/Br exchange of bromonitrile trans-2b. This compound underwent highly retentive Mg/Br exchange in Et2O; less retention was observed in 2-MeTHF and THF. Epimerization rate constants k(tc), were determined at 195 K by measuring the diastereomer ratio of deuteration product d(1)-3b as a function of the delay time before quench. Studies were also performed at varying concentrations of Et2O in toluene. Remarkable dynamic range in k(tc) was seen: relative to reaction at 0.12 M Et2O in toluene, epimerization was 26-, 800-, and 1300-fold faster in Et2O, 2-MeTHF, and THF, respectively. Thus, the identity and concentration of an ethereal solvent can dramatically affect configurational stability. Reaction stoichiometry experiments suggested that, in Et2O, the Grignard reagent derived from trans-2b exists as an i-PrMgCl heterodimer; the invariance of k(tc) over a 20-fold range in [Mg](total) ruled out mandatory deaggregation (or aggregation) on the epimerization path. Analysis of the dependency of k(tc) on [Et2O] and temperature in Et2O/toluene solution at 195, 212, and 231 K indicated fast incremental solvation before rate-limiting ion-pair separation and provided an estimate of the entropic cost of capturing a solvent ligand (-13 +/- 3 eu). Calculations at the MP2/6-31G*(PCM)//B3LYP/6-31G* level provide support for these conclusions and map out a possible ionogenic conducted tour pathway for epimerization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据