4.8 Article

Elucidating the Role of C-Terminal Post-Translational Modifications Using Protein Semisynthesis Strategies: α-Synuclein Phosphorylation at Tyrosine 125

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 134, 期 11, 页码 5196-5210

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja210866j

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [AG019391, AG025440]
  2. ERC [243182]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [243182] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite increasing evidence that supports the role of different post-translational modifications (PTMs) in modulating alpha-synuclein (alpha-syn) aggregation and toxicity, relatively little is known about the functional consequences of each modification and whether or not these modifications are regulated by each other. This lack of knowledge arises primarily from the current lack of tools and methodologies for the site-specific introduction of PTMs in alpha-syn. More specifically, the kinases that mediate selective and efficient phosphorylation of C-terminal tyrosine residues of alpha-syn remain to be identified. Unlike phospho-serine and phospho-threonine residues, which in some cases can be mimicked by serine/threonine --> glutamate or aspartate substitutions, there are no natural amino acids that can mimic phospho-tyrosine. To address these challenges, we developed a general and efficient semisynthetic strategy that enables the site-specific introduction of single or multiple PTMs and the preparation of homogeneously C-terminal modified forms of alpha-syn in milligram quantities. These advances have allowed us to investigate, for the first time, the effects of selective phosphorylation at Y125 on the structure, aggregation, membrane binding, and subcellular localization of alpha-syn. The development of semisynthetic methods for the site-specific introduction of single or PTMs represents an important advance toward determining the roles of such modifications in alpha-syn structure, aggregation, and functions in heath and disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据