4.8 Article

Intestinal Permeability of Cyclic Peptides: Common Key Backbone Motifs Identified

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 134, 期 29, 页码 12125-12133

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja303200d

关键词

-

资金

  1. excellence initiative CIPSM
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 594]
  3. TUM graduate school

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insufficient oral bioavailability is considered as a key limitation for the widespread development of peptides as therapeutics. While the oral bioavailability of small organic compounds is often estimated from simple rules, similar rules do not apply to peptides, and even the high oral bioavailability that is described for a small number of peptides is not well understood. Here we present two highly Caco-2 permeable template structures based on a library of 54 cyclo(-D-Ala-Ala(5)-) peptides with different N-methylation patterns. The first (all-trans) template structure possesses two beta-turns of type II along Ala(6)-D-Ala(1) and Ala(3)-Ala(4) and is only found for one peptide with two N-methyl groups at D-Ala(1) and Ala(6) [(NMe(1,6)]. The second (single-cis) template possesses a characteristic cis peptide bond preceding Ala(5), which results in type VI beta-turn geometry along Ala(4)-Ala(5). Although the second template structure is found in seven peptides carrying N-methyl groups on Ala(5), high Caco-2 permeability is only found for a subgroup of two of them [NMe(1,5) and NMe(1,2,4,5)], suggesting that N-methylation of D-Ala(1) is a prerequisite for high permeability of the second template structure. The structural similarity of the second template structure with the orally bioavailable somatostatin analog cyclo(-Pro-Phe-NMe-D-Trp-NMe-Lys-Thr-NMe-Phe-), and the striking resemblance with both beta-turns of the orally bioavailable peptide cyclosporine A, suggests that the introduction of bioactive sequences on the highly Caco-2 permeable templates may result in potent orally bioavailable drug candidates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据