4.8 Article

N,N-Addition of Frustrated Lewis Pairs to Nitric Oxide: An Easy Entry to a Unique Family of Aminoxyl Radicals

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 134, 期 24, 页码 10156-10168

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja302652a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  2. European Research Council
  3. National Science Foundation [CHE-0957606, CHE-0840453]
  4. ACS Petroleum Research Fund (PRF) [51971-ND3]
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  6. Division Of Chemistry [0957606] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The intramolecular cyclohexylene-bridged P/B frustrated Lewis pair [Mes(2)P-C6H10-B(C6F5)(2)] 1b reacts rapidly with NO to give the persistent FLP-NO aminoxyl radical 2b formed by P/B addition to the nitrogen atom of NO. This species was fully characterized by X-ray diffraction, EPR and UV/vis spectroscopies, C,H,N elemental analysis, and DFT calculations. The reactive oxygen-centered radical 2b undergoes a H-atom abstraction (HAA) reaction with 1,4-cyclohexadiene to give the diamagnetic FLP-NOH product 3b. FLP-NO 2b reacts with toluene at 70 degrees C in an HAA/radical capture sequence to give a 1:1 mixture of FLP-NOH 3b and FLP-NO-CH2Ph 4b, both characterized by X-ray diffraction. Structurally related FLPs [Mes(2)P-CHR1-CHR2-B(C6F5)(2)] 1c, 1d, and 1e react analogously with NO to give the respective persistent FLP-NO radicals 2c, 2d, and 2e, respectively, which show similar HAA and O-functionalization reactions. The FLP-NO-CHMePh 6b derived from 1-bromoethylbenzene undergoes NO-C bond cleavage at 120 degrees C with an activation energy of E-a = 35(2) kcal/mol. Species 6b induces the controlled nitroxide-mediated radical polymerization (NMP) of styrene at 130 degrees C to give polystyrene with a polydispersity index of 1.3. The FLP-NO systems represent a new family of aminoxyl radicals that are easily available by N,N-cycloaddition of C-2-bridged intramolecular P/B frustrated Lewis pairs to nitric oxide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据