4.8 Article

Rh-Catalyzed Intermolecular Reactions of Cyclic α-Diazocarbonyl Compounds with Selectivity over Tertiary C-H Bond Migration

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 134, 期 26, 页码 11035-11043

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja3046712

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS [NIH R01 GM068650]
  2. Division Of Chemistry
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1048367] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intermolecular Rh-catalyzed reactions of cyclic alpha-diazocarbonyl compounds with chemoselectivity over beta-hydride elimination are described. These methods represent the first general intermolecular reactions of Rh-carbenoids that are selective over tertiary beta-C-H bond migration. Successful transformations include cyclopropanation, cyclopropenation, and various X-H insertion reactions with a broad scope of substrates. We propose that the intermolecular approach of substrates to carbenes from acyclic diazo precursors may be relatively slow due to a steric interaction with the ester function, which is perpendicular to the pi-system of the carbene. For carbenes derived from five- and six-membered cyclic alpha-diazocarbonyls, it is proposed that the carbene is constrained to be more conjugated with the carbonyl, thereby relieving the steric interaction for intermolecular reactions, and accelerating the rate of intermolecular reactivity relative to intramolecular beta-hydride migration. However, attempts to use alpha-diazo-beta-ethylcaprolactone in intermolecular cyclopropanation with styrene were unsuccessful. It is proposed that the conformational flexibility of the seven-membered ring allows the carbonyl to be oriented perpendicular to Rh-carbene. The significant intermolecular interaction between the carbonyl and approaching substrate is in agreement with the poor ability of alpha-diazo-beta-ethylcaprolactone to participate in intermolecular cyclopropanation reactions. DFT calculations provide support for the mechanistic proposals that are described.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据