4.8 Article

Does Adsorption at Hydroxyapatite Surfaces Induce Peptide Folding? Insights from Large-Scale B3LYP Calculations

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 134, 期 26, 页码 10899-10910

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja302262y

关键词

-

资金

  1. MICINN [CTQ2011-24847/BQU]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large-scale periodic quantum mechanical calculations (509 atoms, 7852 atomic orbitals) based on the hybrid B3LYP functional focused on the peptide folding induced by the adsorption on the (001) and (010) hydroxyapatite (HA) surfaces give interesting insights on the role of specific interactions between surface sites and the peptide, which stabilize the helix conformation over the native random coil ones for in silico designed model peptides. The two peptides were derived from the 12-Gly oligomer, with one (P1, C-tGGKGGGGGGEGGN-t) and two (P2, C-tGGKGGKEG-GEGGN-t) glutamic acid (E) and lysine (K) residue mutations. The most stable gas-phase native conformation for both peptides resulted in a random coil (RC) structure, with the helix (H) conformation being approximate to 100 kJ mol(-1) higher in free energy. The two peptide conformations interact with the HA (001) and (010) surfaces by C=O groups via Ca2+ ions, by hydrogen bond between NH2 groups and the basic PO43- groups and by a relevant fraction due to dispersion forces. Peptide adsorption was studied on the dry (001) surface, the wet one envisaging 2 H2O per surface Ca2+ and, on the latter, also considering the adsorption of rnicrosolvated peptides with 4 H2O molecules located at sites responsible of the interaction with the surface. The P1 mutant does prefer to be adsorbed as a random coil by approximate to 160 kJ/mol, whereas the reverse is computed for P2, preferring the helix conformation by approximate to 50 kJ/mol. Adsorption as helix of both P1 and P2 mutants brings about proton transfer toward the HA surfaces with a large charge transfer component to the interaction energy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据