4.8 Article

Quantitative Analysis of the Role Played by Poly(vinylpyrrolidone) in Seed-Mediated Growth of Ag Nanocrystals

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 134, 期 3, 页码 1793-1801

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja210047e

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [DMR-1104614]
  2. NIH [R01 CA13852701]
  3. Xiamen University
  4. China Scholarship Council
  5. Division Of Materials Research
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1215034] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a quantitative analysis of the role played by poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) in seed-mediated growth of Ag nanocrystals. Starting from Ag nanocubes encased by {100} facets as the seeds, the resultant nanocrystals could take different shapes depending on the concentration of PVP in the solution. Tithe concentration was above a critical value, the seeds simply grew into larger cubes.still enclosed by.{100} facets. When the concentration fell below a critical value, the seeds would evolve into cuboctahedrons enclosed by a mix of {100} and {111} facets and eventually octahedrons completely covered by {111} facets. We derived the coverage density of PVP on Ag(100) surface by combining the results from two measurements: (i) cubic seeds were followed to grow at a fixed initial concentration of PVP to find out when {111} facets started to appear on the surface, and (ii) cubic seeds were allowed to grow at reduced initial concentrations of PVP to see at which concentration {111} facets started to appear from the very beginning. We could calculate the coverage density of PVP from the differences in PVP concentration and the total surface area of Ag nanocubes between these two samples. The coverage density was found to be 140 and 30 repeating units per nm(2) for PVP of 55 000 and 10 000 g/mol in molecular weight, respectively, for cubic seeds of 40 nm in edge length. These values dropped slightly to 100 and 20 repeating units per nm2, respectively, when 100 nm Ag cubes were used as the seeds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据