4.8 Article

Molecular Recognition of Insulin by a Synthetic Receptor

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 133, 期 23, 页码 8810-8813

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja201581x

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-0748483, DBI-0718766]
  2. Welch Foundation [W-1640, AQ-1399]
  3. W. M. Keck Foundation
  4. Camille and Henry Dreyfus Foundation
  5. National Center for Research Resources at the National Institutes of Health [RR-15301]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  7. Institutional Executive Research Council
  8. San Antonio Cancer Institute
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  10. Division Of Chemistry [0748483] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The discovery of molecules that bind tightly and selectively to desired proteins continues to drive innovation at the interface of chemistry and biology. This paper describes the binding of human insulin by the synthetic receptor cucurbit[7]uril (Q7) in vitro. Isothermal titration calorimetry and fluorescence spectroscopy experiments show that Q7 binds to insulin with an equilibrium association constant of 1.5 x 10(6) M-1 and with 50-100-fold selectivity versus proteins that are much larger but lack an N-terminal aromatic residue, and with >1000-fold selectivity versus an insulin variant lacking the N-terminal phenylalanine (Phe) residue. The crystal structure of the Q7 center dot insulin complex shows that binding occurs at the N-terminal Phe residue and that the N-terminus unfolds to enable binding. These findings suggest that site-selective recognition is based on the properties inherent to a protein terminus, including the unique chemical epitope presented by the terminal residue and the greater freedom of the terminus to unfold, like the end of a ball of string, to accommodate binding. Insulin recognition was predicted accurately from studies on short peptides and exemplifies an approach to protein recognition by targeting the terminus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据