4.8 Article

Dip-Coating Crystallization on a Superhydrophobic Surface: A Million Mounted Crystals in a 1 cm2 Array

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 133, 期 15, 页码 5764-5766

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja2011548

关键词

-

资金

  1. Materials Research Science and Engineering Center [DMR-0213695]
  2. Center for Hierarchical Manufacturing at the University of Massachusetts [CMMI-0531171]
  3. 3M
  4. Henkel
  5. Shocking Technologies
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Materials Research [820506] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silicon wafers (silicon dioxide surfaces) were patterned by photolithograpy to contain 3 mu m (width) x 6 pm (length) x 40 mu cm (height) staggered rhombus posts in a square array (20 mu m center-to-center spacing). These surfaces were hydrophobized using a vapor phase reaction with tridecafluorooctyldimethylchlorosilane and exhibit superhydrophobicity (water contact angles of theta(A)/theta(R) = 169 degrees/156 degrees). When a section of a wafer is submerged in and withdrawn from water, the superhydrophobic surface emerges, apparently completely dry. lithe same procedure is performed using aqueous sodium chloride as the liquid bath, individual crystals of the salt can be observed on the top of each of the posts. Dip-coating crystallization using an aqueous sodium chloride solution of 4.3 M produces crystals with similar to 1 mu m dimensions. A less concentrated solution, 1 M NaCl, renders crystals with similar to 500 nm dimensions. These experiments suggest that superhydrophobic surfaces that emerge from water and are apparently completely dry are, in fact, decorated with micrometer-size (several femtoliters) sessile water drops that rapidly evaporate. This simple technique is useful for preparation of very small liquid drops or puddles (of controlled composition) and for preparation of arrays of controlled size, crystalline substances (dip-coating crystallization).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据