4.8 Article

First Principle Kinetic Studies of Zeolite-Catalyzed Methylation Reactions

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 133, 期 4, 页码 888-899

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja1073992

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO)
  2. Research Board of Ghent University (BOF)
  3. BELSPO [IAP/6/27]
  4. European Research Council under the European Community [240483]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methylations of ethene, propene, and butene by methanol over the acidic microporous H-ZSM-5 catalyst are studied by means of state of the art computational techniques, to derive Arrhenius plots and rate constants from first principles that can directly be compared with the experimental data. For these key elementary reactions in the methanol to hydrocarbons (MTH) process, direct kinetic data became available only recently [J. Catal. 2005, 224, 115-123; J. Catal. 2005, 234, 385-400]. At 350 degrees C, apparent activation energies of 103, 69, and 45 kJ/mol and rate constants of 2.6 x 10(-4), 4.5 x 10(-3), and 1.3 x 10(-2) mol/(g h mbar) for ethene, propene, and butene were ;derived, giving following relative ratios for methylation k(ethene)/k(propene)/k(butene) = 1:17:50. In this work, rate constants including pre-exponential factors are calculated which give very good agreement with the experimental data: apparent activation energies of 94, 62, and 37 kJ/mol for ethene, propene, and butene are found, and relative ratios of methylation k(ethene)/k(propene)/k(butene) = 1:23:763. The entropies of gas phase alkenes are underestimated in the harmonic oscillator approximation due to the occurrence of internal rotations. These low vibrational modes were substituted by manually constructed partition functions. Overall, the absolute reaction rates can be calculated with near chemical accuracy, and qualitative trends are very well reproduced. In addition, the proposed scheme is computationally very efficient and constitutes significant progress in kinetic modeling of reactions in heterogeneous catalysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据