4.8 Article

Oxygen-Tolerant [NiFe]-Hydrogenases: The Individual and Collective Importance of Supernumerary Cysteines at the Proximal Fe-S Cluster

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 133, 期 42, 页码 16881-16892

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja205393w

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biological and Biotechnological Sciences Research Council [H003878-1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/D044855D/1]
  3. Merton College, Oxford
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/H001190/1, BB/H003878/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/D048559/1, EP/H019480/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. BBSRC [BB/H003878/1, BB/H001190/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. EPSRC [EP/H019480/1, EP/D048559/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An important clue to the mechanism for O-2 tolerance of certain [NiFe]-hydrogenases is the conserved presence of a modified environment around the iron sulfur cluster that is proximal to the active site. The O-2-tolerant enzymes contain two cysteines, located at opposite ends of this cluster, which are glycines in their O-2-sensitive counterparts. The strong correlation highlights special importance for electron-transfer activity in the protection mechanism used to combat O-2. Site-directed mutagenesis has been carried out on Escherichia coli hydrogenase-1 to substitute these cysteines (C19 and C120) individually and collectively for glycines, and the effects of each replacement have been determined using protein film electrochemistry and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. The split iron sulfur cluster EPR signal thus far observed when oxygen-tolerant [NiFe]-hydrogenases are subjected to oxidizing potentials is found not to provide any simple, reliable correlation with oxygen tolerance. Oxygen tolerance is largely conferred by a single cysteine (C19), replacement of which by glycine removes the ability to function even in 1% O-2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据