4.8 Article

Synthetic Analogs Tailor Native Al-2 Signaling Across Bacterial Species

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 132, 期 32, 页码 11141-11150

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja102587w

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Maryland
  2. R.W. Deutsch Foundation
  3. Defense Threat Reduction Agency
  4. National Science Foundation [CHE0746446, CHE0946988]
  5. National Science Foundation
  6. Ministry of Education
  7. Division Of Chemistry
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0746446] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The widespread use of antibiotics and the emergence of resistant strains call for new approaches to treat bacterial infection. Bacterial cell cell communication or quorum sensing (QS) is mediated by signatures of small molecules that represent targets for quenching communication and avoiding virulent phenotypes. Only a handful of small molecules that antagonize the action of the universal autoinducer, Al-2, have been reported. The biological basis of antagonism, as well as the targets for these select few Al-2 antagonists, have not been clearly defined. We have developed C-1 alkyl analogs of Al-2 that quench the OS response in multiple bacterial species simultaneously. We also demonstrate the biological basis for this action. Like Al-2, the analogs are activated by the bacterial kinase, LsrK, and modulate Al-2 specific gene transcription through the transcriptional regulator, LsrR. Interestingly, addition of a single carbon to the C1-alkyl chain of the analog plays a crucial role in determining the effect of the analog on the QS response. While an ethyl modified analog is an agonist, propyl becomes an antagonist of the QS circuit. In a trispecies synthetic ecosystem comprised of E. coli, S. typhimurium, and V. harveyi we discovered both cross-species and species-specific anti-Al-2 QS activities. Our results suggest entirely new modalities for interrupting or tailoring the network of communication among bacteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据