4.8 Article

Design of Liquid Crystals with de Vries-like Properties: Frustration between SmA- and SmC-Promoting Elements

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 132, 期 1, 页码 364-370

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja9087727

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemcinschaft (DFG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

According to a new design strategy for de Vries-like liquid crystal materials, which are characterized by a maximum layer contraction of <= 1% upon transition from the SmA phase to the SmC phase, we report the synthesis and characterization of two homologous series of organosiloxane mesogens. The design of these new materials is based on a frustration between one structural element that promotes the formation of a SmC phase (a trisiloxane-terminated side-chain) and one that promotes the formation of a SmA phase (either a chloro-terminated side-chain or a 5-phenylpyrimidine core). Measurements of smectic layer spacing d as a function of temperature by small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) combined with optical tilt angle measurements revealed that the mesogens 5-(4-(11-(1,1,1,3,3,5,5-heptamethyltrisiloxanyl)-undecyloxy)phenyl)-2-(1-alkyloxy)pyrimidine (3(n)) undergo SmA-SmC phase transitions with maximum layer contractions ranging from 0.5% to 1.4%. A comparison of reduction factors R and f suggests that this behavior is due in part to a pronounced negative thermal expansion in the SmC phase that counterbalances the layer contraction caused by increasing tilt. SAXS measurements also revealed that compounds 3(n) are characterized by low orientational and high translational order, which is consistent with theoretical predictions that such materials should exhibit de Vries-like properties. The R values for series 3(n) are comparable to, and even lower than, those reported for established de Vries-like materials such as the perfluorinated 2-phenylpyrimidine material 3M 8422.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据