4.8 Article

Dynamics of 1,3-Dipolar Cycloadditions: Energy Partitioning of Reactants and Quantitation of Synchronicity

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 132, 期 9, 页码 3029-3037

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja909372f

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-0548209, CHE-0616712, CHE-0910876]
  2. Division Of Chemistry
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0910876] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dynamics of 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions of nine 1,3-dipoles with ethylene and acetylene have been explored by quasiclassical trajectory and single trajectory calculations in the retro-cycloaddition direction to compute energy partitioning of reactants among relative translation, vibration, and rotation. The results are interpreted with an expanded version of Polanyi's Rules for bimolecular reactions, and three trends are evident. (1) Relative translation of reactants is the main contributor to surmounting the barrier, since all transition states (TSs) are early with respect to sigma bond formation. (2) Vibrational excitation in the 1,3-dipole bending modes required for reaction is related to the lateness of the TS with respect to dipole bending: diazonium betaines (late TS, dipole bending required) > nitrilium betaines > azomethine betaines (early TS, dipole bending least important). This is also the order of the activation barriers (high -> low). (3) The previously reported linear correlation between activation barriers and the energy required to distort reactants to their TS geometries are understandable in terms of the requirements for vibrational excitation computed here. For the 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions, single trajectory calculations, which contain no zero point vibrational energy, give reasonable estimates of the mean energy partitioning of reactants derived from potential energy barrier release. The timing of bond formation and relative reactivities of different 1,3-dipoles are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据