4.8 Article

Comparative Analysis of Small Molecules and Histone Substrate Analogues as LSD1 Lysine Demethylase Inhibitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 132, 期 9, 页码 3164-3176

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja909996p

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

LSD1 is a flavin-dependent histone demethylase that oxidatively removes methyl groups from Lys-4 of histone H3. LSD1 belongs to the amine oxidase enzyme superfamily which utilize molecular oxygen to transform amines to imines that are hydrolytically cleaved to formaldehyde. In prior studies, it has been shown that monoamine oxidase inhibitory scaffolds such as propargylamines and cyclopropylamines can serve as mechanism-based inactivators of LSD1. Propargylamine-histone H3 peptide analogues are potent LSD1 inhibitors, whereas small molecule antidepressant MAO acetylenic inhibitors like pargyline do not inhibit LSD1. In contrast, the small molecule MAO cyclopropylamine inhibitor tranylcypromine is a time-dependent LSD1 inhibitor but exo-cyclopropylamine-peptide substrate analogue is not. To provide further insight into small molecule versus peptide relationships in LSD1 inhibition, herein we further our analysis of warheads in peptide scaffolds to include the chlorovinyl, endo-cyclopropylamine, and hydrazine-functionalities as LSD1 inactivators. We find that chlorovinyl-H3 is a mechanism-based LSD1 inactivator whereas endo-cyclopropylamine-H3 does not show time-dependent inactivation. The hydrazine-H3 was shown to be the most potent LSD1 suicide inhibitor yet reported, more than 20-fold more efficient in inhibiting demethylation than propargylamine-H3 derivatives. We re-explored MAO antidepressant agent phenelzine (phenethylhydrazine), previously reported to be a weak LSD1 inhibitor, and found that it is far more potent than previously appreciated. We show that phenelzine can block histone H3K4Me demethylation in cells, validating it as a pharmacologic tool and potential lead structure for anticancer therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据