4.8 Article

Triple-Stranded Metallo-Helicates Addressable as Lloyd's Electron Spin Qubits

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 132, 期 20, 页码 6944-+

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja102030w

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ogasawara Foundation
  2. Iketani Science and Technology Foundation
  3. Osaka University
  4. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  5. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22550124] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have first achieved the synthesis of triple-stranded metallo-helicates composed of 4,4':2',2 '':4 '',4 '''-quaterimidazole (Qim) and Mn(II) or Zn(II) ions, which serve as synthetic electron spin qubits (quantum bits). In the crystal structure, a hydrogen-bonding network through counteranions and/or crystal solvents was constructed by the outward N-H hydrogen-bonding functional groups intrinsic to the imidazole skeleton. Importantly, these helicates showed high stability even in a solution state at room temperature. These salient features of triple helicates of Qim are different from those of reported metallo-helicates. These chemical properties of the Qim-based triple helicates allow us to synthesize magnetically diluted single crystals composed of Mn(II) (S = 5/2) and diamagnetic Zn(II) complexes of Qim in an appropriate Mn(II)/Zn(II) ratio. The magnetically diluted crystals can afford to build up the prototype of electron-spin qubits of Lloyd's one-dimensional periodic system, which gives a practical approach to scalable quantum computers/quantum information processing systems (QCs/QIPSs). The experiments have proven the practical capability of oligo(imidazole)s as a component of Lloyd's system which has nonequivalent g-tensors within the helicate (g-engineering). The helical symmetry plays an important role in giving a prototype of the synthetic spin qubits of the formidable Lloyd model. This result links supramolecular chemistry to the field of QCs/QIPSs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据