4.8 Article

Charge Recombination and Exciton Annihilation Reactions in Conjugated Polymer Blends

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 132, 期 1, 页码 328-335

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja908046h

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/C548132/1]
  2. Fitzwilliam College Cambridge
  3. EU commission
  4. Cambridge Commonwealth Trust
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/C544838/1, EP/C548132/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bimolecular interactions between excitations in conjugated polymer thin films are important because they influence the efficiency of many optoelectronic devices that require high excitation densities. Using time-resolved optical spectroscopy, we measure the bimolecular interactions of charges, singlet excitons, and triplet excitons in intimately mixed polyfluorene blends with band-edge offsets optimized for photoinduced electron transfer. Bimolecular charge recombination and triplet-triplet annihilation are negligible, but exciton-charge interactions are efficient. The annihilation of singlet excitons by charges occurs on picosecond time-scales and reaches a rate equivalent to that of charge transfer. Triplet exciton annihilation by charges occurs on nanosecond time-scales. The surprising absence of nongeminate charge recombination is shown to be due to the limited mobility of charge carriers at the heterojunction. Therefore, extremely high densities of charge pairs can be maintained in the blend. The absence of triplet-triplet annihilation is a consequence of restricted triplet diffusion in the blend morphology. We suggest that the rate and nature of bimolecular interactions are determined by the stochastic excitation distribution in the polymer blend and the limited connectivity between the polymer domains. A model based on these assumptions quantitatively explains the effects. Our findings provide a comprehensive framework for understanding bimolecular recombination and annihilation processes in nanostructured materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据