4.8 Article

CopK from Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34 Binds Cu(I) in a Tetrathioether Site: Characterization by X-ray Absorption and NMR Spectroscopy

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 132, 期 11, 页码 3770-3777

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja9083896

关键词

-

资金

  1. Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique
  2. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  3. Universite Joseph Fourier
  4. French program Tox-Nuc-E

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34 is a bacterium that is resistant to high metal concentrations in the environment. Increased copper resistance is associated with the cop cluster on the large plasmid pMOL30 that is composed of at least 21 genes. The copK gene encodes a 74 residue periplasmic protein whose expression is strongly upregulated in the presence of copper. CopK was previously shown to cooperatively bind Cu(I) and Cu(II) in distinct, specific sites. The solution structure of Cu(I)-CopK and the characterization of the Cu(I) site by X-ray absorption spectroscopy and NMR are reported here. EXAFS spectra are in agreement with a tetrathioether Cu(I) site, providing so far unique spectral information on a 4S-coordinated Cu(I) in a protein. The methionine residues forming the Cu(I) site, M28, M38, M44, and M54, are identified by NMR. We propose the chemical shift of the methionine C-epsilon as a new and sensitive probe for the detection of Cu(I) bound to thioether groups. The solution structure of Cu(I)-CopK demonstrates that Cu(I) binding induces a complete structural modification with the disruption of the second beta-sheet and a rotation of the C-terminal part of nearly 180 degrees around a hinge formed by asparagine 57. This conformational change is directly related to the loss of the dimer interface and most probably to the formation of the Cu(II) site involving histidine 70. The solution structure of Cu(I)-CopK therefore provides the molecular basis for the understanding of the Cu(I)/Cu(II) binding cooperativity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据