4.8 Article

Accurate Solution Structures of Proteins from X-ray Data and a Minimal Set of NMR Data: Calmodulin-Peptide Complexes As Examples

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 131, 期 14, 页码 5134-5144

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja8080764

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ente Cassa di Rispamio
  2. MIUR-FIRB [RBLA032ZM7, RBIP06LSS2]
  3. European Commission [EU-NMR 026145, SPINE2-COMPLEXES 031220, LSHG-CT-2004-512052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A strategy for the accurate determination of protein solution structures starting from X-ray data and a minimal set of NMR data is proposed and successfully applied to two complexes of calmodulin (CaM) with target peptides not previously described. Its implementation in the present case is based on the use of lanthanide ions as substitutes for calcium in one of the four calcium binding sites of CaM and the collection of pseudocontact shift (pcs) and residual dipolar coupling (rdc) restraints induced by the paramagnetic metals. Starting from the crystal structures, new structural models are calculated that are in excellent agreement with the paramagnetic restraints and differ significantly from the starting crystal structures. In particular, in both complexes, a change in orientation of the first helix of the N-terminal CaM domain and of the whole C-terminal domain is observed. The simultaneous use of paramagnetic pcs and rdc restraints has the following crucial advantages: (i) it allows one to assess the possible presence of interdomain conformational freedom, which cannot be detected if the rdc values are derived from external orienting media; (ii) in the absence of significant conformational freedom, the global orientation tensor can be independently and precisely determined from pcs values, which are less sensitive than rdc values to the presence of local structural inaccuracies, and therefore (iii) the relative rearrangement of a domain or a secondary structure element with respect to the metal-bearing domain can be detected.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据