4.8 Article

Metal-Ion Mutagenesis: Conversion of a Purple Acid Phosphatase from Sweet Potato to a Neutral Phosphatase with the Formation of an Unprecedented Catalytically Competent MnIIMnII Active Site

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 131, 期 23, 页码 8173-8179

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja900797u

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. Bruker Biospin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The currently accepted paradigm is that the purple acid phosphatases (PAPs) require a heterovalent, dinuclear metal-ion center for catalysis. It is believed that this is an essential feature for these enzymes in order for them to operate under acidic conditions. A PAP from sweet potato is unusual in that it appears to have a specific requirement for manganese, forming a unique Fe-III-mu-(O)-Mn-II center under catalytically optimal conditions (Schenk et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102, 273). Herein, we demonstrate, with detailed electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopic and kinetic studies, that in this enzyme the chromophoric Fe-III can be replaced by Mn-II, forming a catalytically active, unprecedented antiferromagnetically coupled homodivalent Mn-II-mu-(H)OH-mu-carboxylato-Mn-II center in a PAP. However, although the enzyme is still active, it no longer functions as an acid phosphatase, having optimal activity at neutral pH. Thus, PAPs may have evolved from distantly related divalent dinuclear metallohydrolases that operate under pH neutral conditions by stabilization of a trivalent-divalent metal-ion core. The present Mn-II-Mn-II system models these distant relatives, and the results herein make a significant contribution to our understanding of the role of the chromophoric metal ion as an activator of the nucleophile. In addition, the detailed analysis of strain broadened EPR spectra from exchange-coupled dinuclear Mn-II-Mn-II centers described herein provides the basis for the full interpretation of the EPR spectra from other dinuclear Mn metalloenzymes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据