4.8 Review

Hexacationic Dendriphos Ligands in the Pd-Catalyzed Suzuki-Miyaura Cross-Coupling Reaction: Scope and Mechanistic Studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 131, 期 32, 页码 11407-11416

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja904042h

关键词

-

资金

  1. Utrecht University, The Netherlands
  2. BASF Nederland N. V., De Meem

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combination of Pd(2)dba(3)center dot CHCl3 and hexacationic triarylphosphine-based Dendriphos ligands (1-3) leads to a highly active catalytic system in the Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reaction. Under relatively mild reaction conditions, nonactivated aryl bromides and activated aryl chlorides can be coupled at a low Pd loading (0.1 mol %). The observed activity of this catalytic system, in particular in coupling reactions of aryl chlorides, is dramatically higher than that of conventional Pd catalysts employing triarylphosphine ligands. Through control and poisoning experiments, it is concluded that a homogeneous Pd(0)-Dendriphos complex is the active species in this catalytic system. Despite their triarylphosphine-based structure, Dendriphos ligands behave as very bulky phosphine ligands and lead to a preferential formation of coordinatively unsaturated and catalytically active Pd(0) species, which explains the observed high catalytic activity for these systems. The presence of six permanent cationic charges in the backbone of this class of ligands is proposed to result in a significant interligand Coulombic repulsion and plays a crucial role in their bulky behavior. In the coupling reactions of activated aryl chlorides, a positive dendritic kinetic effect was observed among the different Dendriphos generations, indicating an increased ability of the higher ligand generations to stabilize the active species due to steric effects. For aryl bromides, no dendritic effect was observed due to a shift in the rate-determining step in the catalytic cycle, from oxidative addition for aryl chlorides to transmetalation for aryl bromides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据