4.8 Article

Nanoparticle-Mediated IgE-Receptor Aggregation and Signaling in RBL Mast Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 131, 期 47, 页码 17328-17334

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja907125t

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH
  2. NCI
  3. NIGMS
  4. State of Florida Center for Nano-Biosensors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Complex cell behaviors are usually triggered by multivalent ligands that first bind to membrane receptors and then promote receptor clustering, thus altering intracellular signal transduction. While it is possible to produce such altered signal transduction by synthetic means, the development of chemically defined multivalent ligands of effectors is sometimes difficult and tedious. Specifically, the average spacing between two binding sites within an antibody and the average distance between receptors on the cell membrane are usually larger than most organic molecules. In this study, we directly address these challenges by demonstrating how gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) of precisely controlled mean diameters can be easily synthesized and surface-modified with dinitrophenyl (DNP) at an equally well-controlled ligand density or spacing. We found that both nanoparticle size and surface ligand density play key regulatory roles in the process of membrane antibody-receptor (IgE-Fc epsilon RI) binding and cross-linking, which, in turn, leads to degranulation and consequent release of chemical mediators on rat basophilic leukemia cells. In addition, by adjusting DNP-AuNP architecture, we discovered that our conjugates could either promote or inhibit cellular activation. Thus, these results demonstrate that nanoparticles serve not only as simple platforms for multivalent binding but also as mediators for key biological functions. As such, the findings we report here may provide insight into the use of nanoparticles as a comprehensive tool for use in detailed receptor/ligand interaction studies and in the design of nanoscale delivery and therapeutic systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据