4.8 Article

Electronic and Magnetic Properties of Partially Open Carbon Nanotubes

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 131, 期 49, 页码 17919-17925

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja907212g

关键词

-

资金

  1. KIST [2E21040]
  2. MEST/KOSEF
  3. Korean Government MOEHRD [KRF-2006-341-C000015]
  4. BK21 program
  5. KOSEF [R11-2008-053-01002-0]
  6. MEST
  7. KOSEF-NSFC-JSPS
  8. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2006CB605105, 2006CB0L0601]
  9. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  10. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [2E21040] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  11. National Research Foundation of Korea [과06A1102, R11-2008-053-01002-0, 2009-0093853, 2008-0062236] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

On the basis of the spin-polarized density functional theory calculations, we demonstrate that partially open carbon nanotubes (CNTs) observed in recent experiments have rich electronic and magnetic properties which depend on the degree of the opening. A partially open armchair CNT is converted from a metal to a semiconductor and then to a spin-polarized semiconductor by increasing the length of the opening on the wall. Spin-polarized states become increasingly more stable than nonmagnetic states as the length of the opening is further increased. In addition, external electric fields or chemical modifications are usable to control the electronic and magnetic properties of the system. We show that half-metallicity may be achieved and the spin current may be controlled by external electric fields or by asymmetric functionalization of the edges of the opening. Our findings suggest that partially open CNTs may offer unique opportunities for the future development of nanoscale electronics and spintronics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据