4.8 Article

Mechanism of Very Large Scale Assembly of SWNTs in Template Guided Fluidic Assembly Process

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 131, 期 2, 页码 804-808

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja8076523

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center (NSEC)
  2. Semiconductor Research Corporation (SRC-CSR)
  3. National Science Foundation [CMMI-0825864]
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [0825864] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Directorate For Engineering
  7. Div Of Engineering Education and Centers [832785] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys
  9. Directorate For Engineering [0925566] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Very large scale patterned single-walled carbon nanotube (SWNT) networks were fabricated using a newly developed template guided fluidic assembly process. A mechanism for SWNT assembly and their control is described here. To maximize the directed assembly efficiency of SWNTs toward a wafer level SWNT deposition, Si or SiO2 substrate was pretreated with precisely controlled SF6, O-2, and Ar plasma. Chemical and physical properties of the surface were characterized using several surface characterization techniques to investigate and control the mechanism of SWNT assembly. We found that hydrophilic chemical groups such as hydroxides were created on the silicon or silicon oxide surface through the controlled plasma treatment and fluidic SWNT dip-coating process. Also we found that nanoscale rough surface structures formed during the plasma treatment significantly increased the number of dangling bonds and hydroxide functional groups on the surface. These combined chemical and physical enhancements that attract SWNTs in the aqueous solution enable us to build highly organized and very large scale SWNT network architectures effectively in various dimensions and geometries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据