Dioxygen and Water Activation Processes on Multi-Ru-Substituted Polyoxometalates: Comparison with the Blue-Dimer Water Oxidation Catalyst

Dioxygen and water activation on multi-Ru-substituted polyoxometalates were studied using the B3LYP density functional method. It was shown that the reaction of the Ru-2-substituted gamma-Keggin polyoxotungstate, {gamma-[(H2O)Ru-III-(mu-OH)(2)-Ru-III(H2O)][SiW10O36]}(4-), I(H2O), with O-2 is a 4-electron highly exothermic [Delta E-gas = 62.5 (Delta E-gas + Delta G(solv(water)) = 24.6) kcal/mol] process and leads to formation of (H2O){gamma-[(O)Ru-(mu-OH)(2)-Ru(O)](H2O)[SiW10O36]}(4-), IV(H2O). Both the stepwise (or dissociative) and the concerted (or associative) pathways of this reaction occurring with and without water dissociation, respectively, were examined, and the latter has been found to be kinetically more favorable. It was shown that the first 1e-oxidation is achieved by the H2O-to-O-2 substitution, which might occur with a maximum of 23.1 (10.5) kcal/mol barrier and leads to the formation of {gamma-[(OO)Ru-(mu-OH)(2)-Ru(H2O)](H2O)[SiW10O36]}(4-), II(H2O). The second le-oxidation is initiated by the proton transfer from the coordinated water molecule to the superoxide (OO-) ligand in II(H2O) and is completed upon formation of hydroperoxo-hydroxo intermediate {gamma-[(OOH)Ru-(mu-OH)(2)-Ru(OH)](H2O)[SiW10O36]}(4-), III-1(H2O). The final 2e-oxidation occurs upon the proton transfer from the terminal OH-ligand to the Ru-coordinated OOH fragment and is completed at the formation of (H2O)center dot center dot center dot{gamma-[(O)Ru-(mu-OH)(2)-Ru(O)](H2O)[SiW10O36]}(4-), IV(H2O), with two Ru=O bonds. Each step in the associative pathway is exothermic and occurs with small energy barriers. During the process, the oxidation state of Ru centers increases from +3 to +4. The resulting IV(H2O) with a [Ru(Omicron)-(mu-OH)(2)-Ru(O)} core should be formulated to have the Ru-IV=O-center dot units, rather than the Ru-V=O groups. The reverse reaction, water oxidation by IV(H2O), is found to be highly endothermic and cannot occur; this finding is different from that reported for the blue-dimer intermediate, {(bpy)(2)[(O-center dot)Ru-(mu-O)-Ru(O-center dot)](bpy)(2)}(4+), which readily oxidized an incoming water molecule to produce O-2.(2,29-40,60-62) The main reason for this difference in reactivity of IV(H2O) (i.e., Ru-2-POM) and the blue-dimer intermediates toward the water molecule is found to be a high stability of IV(H2O) as compared to the analogous blue-dimer intermediate relative to O-2 formation. This, in turn, derives from the electron-rich nature of (SiW10O36](4-) as compared to bpy ligands.