4.8 Article

From triazines to heptazines: Deciphering the local structure of amorphous nitrogen-rich carbon nitride materials

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 130, 期 23, 页码 7373-7379

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja709992s

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrogen-rich carbon nitride (CNx, x >= 1) network materials have been produced as disordered structures by a variety of precursor-based methods, many that involve solid-state thermolysis at or above 500 degrees C. One popular precursor building block is the triazine unit (C3N3), and most postulated amorphous CNx network structures are based on cross-linked triazine units. Since hydrogen is most often observed in the product, these materials are usually more appropriately described as CNxHy,materials. Results from recent carbon nitride studies using larger conjugated heptazine (C6N7) precursors and from rigorous structural investigations of triazine to heptazine thermal conversion processes have prompted a reexamination of likely local structures present in amorphous carbon nitride networks formed by triazine thermolysis reactions. In the present study, the. formation and local structure of a CNxHy material formed via the rapid and exothermic decomposition of a reactive triazine precursor, C3N3(NHCl)(3), was examined by byproduct gas mass spectrometry, NMR and IR spectroscopy, base hydrolysis, and crystallographic analysis. The combined results clearly indicate that the mode rate-ternperature (similar to 400 degrees C) self-sustaining decomposition of trichloromelamine results in ring fragmentation and reorganization into a CNxHy product that contains predominantly larger heptazine-like structural building blocks. These results may have applicability to many other disordered carbon nitride materials that are formed via triazine thermolysis. It also provides clearer and. more accurate structural guidance in the use of these carbon nitrides as photoactive materials or coordination supports for metal and nonmetal species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据