4.8 Article

Role of backbone - Solvent interactions in determining conformational equilibria of intrinsically disordered proteins

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 130, 期 23, 页码 7380-7392

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja710446s

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are functional proteins that do not fold into well-defined three-dimensional structures under physiological conditions. IDP sequences have low hydrophobicity, and hence, recent experiments have focused on quantitative studies of conformational ensembles of archetypal IDP sequences such as polyglutamine and glycine-serine block copolypeptides. Results from these experiments show that, despite the absence of hydrophobic residues, polar IDPs prefer ensembles of collapsed structures in aqueous milieus. Do these preferences originate in interactions that are unique to polar sidechains? The current study addresses this issue by analyzing conformational equilibria for polyglycine and a glycine-serine block copolypeptide in two environments, namely, water and 8 M urea. Polyglycine, a poly secondary-amide, has no sidechains and is a useful model system for generic polypeptide backbones. Results based on large-scale molecular dynamics simulations show that polyglycine forms compact, albeit disordered, globules in water and swollen, disordered coils in 8 M urea. There is minimal overlap between conformational ensembles in the two environments. Analysis of order parameters derived from theories for flexible polymers show that water at ambient temperatures is a poor solvent for generic polypeptide backbones. Therefore, the experimentally observed preferences for polyglutamine and glycine-serine block copolypeptides must originate, at least partially, in polypeptide backbones. A preliminary analysis of the driving forces that lead to distinct conformational preferences for polyglycine in two different environments is presented. Implications for describing conformational ensembles of generic IDP sequences are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据