4.8 Article

B2(BO)22- -: Diboronyl diborene:: A linear molecule with a triple boron-boron bond

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 130, 期 8, 页码 2573-2579

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja0771080

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have produced and investigated an unique boron oxide cluster, B4O2, using photoelectron spectroscopy and ab initio calculations. Relatively simple and highly vibrationally resolved PIES spectra were obtained at two photon energies (355 and 193 nm). The electron affinity of neutral B4O2 was measured to be 3.160 +/- 0.015 eV. Two excited states were observed for B4O2 at excitation energies of 0.48 and 0.83 eV above the ground state. Three vibrational modes were resolved in the 355 nm spectrum for the ground state of B4O2 with frequencies of 350 +/- 40, 1530 +/- 30, and 2040 +/- 30 cm(-1). Ab initio calculations showed that neutral B4O2 (D-infinity h, (3)Sigma(-)(g)) and anionic B4O2- (D-infinity h, (2)Pi(u)) both possess highly stable linear structures (O B-B = B-B O), which can be viewed as a B-2 dimer bonded to two terminal boronyl groups. The lowest nonlinear structures are at least 1.5 eV higher in energy. The calculated electron detachment energies from the linear B4O2- and the vibrational frequencies agree well with the experimental results. The three observed vibrational modes are due to the B-B, B = B, and B O symmetric stretching vibrations, respectively, in the linear B-2(BO)(2). Chemical bonding analyses revealed that the HOMO of B-2(BO)(2), which is half-filled, is a bonding 7 orbital in the central B-2 unit. Thus, adding two electrons to B-2(BO)(2) leads to a B B triple bond in [O B-B B-B O](2-). Possibilities for stabilizing B-2(BO)(2)(2-) in the form of B-2(BO)(2)Li-2 are considered computationally and compared with other valent isoelectronic, triple bonded species, B2H2-Li-2; B2H22-, and C2H2. The high stability of B-2(BO)(2)(2-) suggests that it may exist as a viable building block in the condensed phase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据