4.8 Article

Lattice Dynamics To Trigger Low Temperature Oxygen Mobility in Solid Oxide Ion Conductors

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 130, 期 47, 页码 16080-16085

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja806144a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Rennes Metropole
  2. Region Bretagne
  3. French Ministry for Education and Research (CPER 2000-06)
  4. NIS centre of excellence (Torino, Italy)
  5. ILL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SrFeO(2.5) and SrCoO(2.5) are able to intercalate oxygen in a reversible topotactic redox reaction already at room temperature to form the cubic perovskites Sr(Fe,Co)O(3), while CaFeO(2.5) can only be oxidized under extreme conditions. To explain this significant difference in low temperature oxygen mobility, we investigated the homologous SrFeO(2.5) and CaFeO(2.5) by temperature dependent oxygen isotope exchange as well as by inelastic neutron scattering (INS) studies, combined with ab initio (DFT) molecular dynamical calculations. From (18)O/(16)O isotope exchange experiments we proved free oxygen mobility to be realized in SrFeO(x) already below 600 K. We have also evidence that low temperature oxygen mobility relies on the existence of specific, low energy lattice modes, which trigger and amplify oxygen mobility in solids. We interpret the INS data together with the DFT-based molecular dynamical simulation results on SrFeO(2.5) and CaFeO(2.5) in terms of an enhanced, phonon-assisted, low temperature oxygen diffusion for SrFeO(3-x) as a result of the strongly reduced Fe-O-Fe bond strength of the apical oxygen atoms in the FeO(6) octahedra along the stacking axis. This dynamically triggered phenomenon leads to an easy migration of the oxide ions into the open vacancy channels and vice versa. The decisive impact of lattice dynamics, giving rise to structural instabilities in oxygen deficient perovskites, especially with brown millerite-type structure, is demonstrated, opening new concepts for the design and tailoring of low temperature oxygen ion conductors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据