4.8 Article

Combined electrostatics and hydrogen bonding determine intermolecular interactions between polyphosphoinositides

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 130, 期 28, 页码 9025-9030

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja800948c

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL067286-07, R01 HL067286] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01 AR038910, R01 AR038910-19] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Membrane lipids are active contributors to cell function as key mediators in signaling pathways controlling cell functions including inflammation, apoptosis, migration, and proliferation. Recent work on multimolecular lipid structures suggests a critical role for lipid organization in regulating the function of both lipids and proteins. Of particular interest in this context are the polyphosphoinositides (PPI's), especially phosphatidylinositol (4,5) bisphosphate (PIP2). The cellular functions of PIP2 are numerous but the organization of PIP2 in the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane, as well as the factors controlling targeting of PIP2 to specific proteins, remains poorly understood. To analyze the organization of PIP2 in a simplified planar system, we used Langmuir monolayers to study the effects of subphase conditions on monolayers of purified naturally derived PIP2 and other anionic or zwitterionic phospholipids. We report a significant molecular area expanding effect of subphase monovalent salts on PIP2 at biologically relevant surface densities. This effect is shown to be specific to PIP2 and independent of subphase pH. Chaotropic agents (e.g., salts, trehalose, urea, temperature) that disrupt water structure and the ability of water to mediate intermolecular hydrogen bonding also specifically expanded PIP2 monolayers. These results suggest a combination of water-mediated hydrogen bonding and headgroup repulsion in determining the organization of PIP2, and may contribute to an explanation for the unique functionality of PIP2 compared to other anionic phospholipids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据