4.6 Article

Late Enteral Feedings Are Associated with Intestinal Inflammation and Adverse Neonatal Outcomes

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132924

关键词

-

资金

  1. Program for Faculty Development and Diversity of Harvard Catalyst, Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center, National Center for Research Resources [UL1 RR 025758]
  2. Program for Faculty Development and Diversity of Harvard Catalyst, Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center, National Center for Research Resources (Harvard University and its affiliated academic health care centers) [1R01DK104346-01]
  3. Charles H. Hood Foundation
  4. Alden Trust
  5. Gerber Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Morbidities of impaired immunity and dysregulated inflammation are common in preterm infants. Postnatal Intestinal development plays a critical role in the maturation of the immune system and is, in part, driven by exposure to an enteral diet. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the timing of the first enteral feeding on intestinal inflammation and risk of disease. Methods 30 infants <33 weeks' gestation were studied. Maternal and infant data were abstracted from the medical record. Single and multiplex ELISA assays quantified cytokines from fecal and serum samples at two weeks postnatal age. Results A delay in enteral feedings after the third postnatal day is associated with a 4.5 (95% CI 1.8-11.5, p=0.002) fold increase in chronic lung disease, 2.9 (1.1-7.8, p=0.03) fold increase in retinopathy of prematurity, and 3.4 (1.2-9.8, p=0.02) fold increase in multiple comorbidities compared to infants fed on or before the third day. Additionally, a delay in the initiation of feedings is associated with increased fecal IL-8 levels and a decreased IL-10: IL-8 ratio. Conclusions A delay in enteral feeding is associated with intestinal inflammation and increased risks of morbidities. To improve neonatal outcomes, early nutritional practices need to be reevaluated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据