4.6 Article

Vitamin D and C-Reactive Protein: A Mendelian Randomization Study

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131740

关键词

-

资金

  1. Erasmus Medical Center
  2. Erasmus University Rotterdam
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  4. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw)
  5. Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly (RIDE)
  6. Netherlands Heart Foundation
  7. Ministry of Education, Culture and Science
  8. Ministry of Health Welfare and Sports
  9. European Commission
  10. Municipality of Rotterdam
  11. NWO grant (veni) [916.12.154]
  12. EUR Fellowship
  13. Nestle Nutrition (Nestec Ltd.)
  14. Metagenics Inc.
  15. AXA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vitamin D deficiency is widely prevalent and has been associated with many diseases. It has been suggested that vitamin D has effects on the immune system and inhibits inflammation. The aim of our study was to investigate whether vitamin D has an inhibitory effect on systemic inflammation by assessing the association between serum levels of vitamin D and C-reactive protein. We studied the association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and C-reactive protein through linear regression in 9,649 participants of the Rotterdam Study, an observational, prospective population-based cohort study. We used genetic variants related to vitamin D and CRP to compute a genetic risk score and perform bi-directional Mendelian randomization analysis. In linear regression adjusted for age, sex, cohort and other confounders, natural log-transformed CRP decreased with 0.06 (95% CI: -0.08, -0.03) unit per standard deviation increase in 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Bi-directional Mendelian randomization analyses showed no association between the vitamin D genetic risk score and lnCRP (Beta per SD = -0.018; p = 0.082) or the CRP genetic risk score and 25-hydroxyvitamin D (Beta per SD = 0.001; p = 0.998). In conclusion, higher levels of Vitamin D are associated with lower levels of C-reactive protein. In this study we did not find evidence for this to be the result of a causal relationship.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据