4.7 Article

Microwave Dielectric Properties of Li2(M2+)2Mo3O12 and Li3(M3+)Mo3O12 (M=Zn, Ca, Al, and In) Lyonsite-Related-Type Ceramics with Ultra-Low Sintering Temperatures

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
卷 94, 期 3, 页码 802-805

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04148.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. National 973-project of China [2009CB623302]
  2. International Science and Technology Collaboration [2009DFA51820]
  3. NSFC of China [60871044, 50835007]
  4. National Science Foundation as part of Center for Dielectric Studies [0628817]
  5. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh
  6. Directorate For Engineering [0628817] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, the Li-2(M2+)(2)Mo3O12 and Li-3(M3+)Mo3O12 (M=Zn, Ca, Al, and In) lyonsite-related structures were prepared using a solid-state reaction method. Single-phase lyonsite materials were formed for the following compositions Li2Zn2Mo3O12, Li3AlMo3O12, and Li3InMo3O12 ceramics. Whereas, the Li2Ca2Mo3O12 batched compositions produced Li2MoO4 and CaMoO4 phases. All the four ceramics did not react with Ag and Al powders at their optimal sintering temperatures, which will permit the possibility of cofired electrodes with these metallurgies. The Li2Zn2Mo3O12 ceramic can be sintered at 630 degrees C with a relative permittivity of 11.1, a Q x f value of similar to 70 000 GHz, and a temperature coefficient of -90 ppm/degrees C at 14.6 GHz. The Li3AlMo3O12 ceramic sintered at 570 degrees C has a relative permittivity of 9.5, a Q x f value of similar to 50 000 GHz, and a temperature coefficient of -73 ppm/degrees C at 14.1 GHz. The Li3InMo3O12 ceramic sintered at 630 degrees C has a relative permittivity of 9.8, a Q x f value of similar to 36 000 GHz, and a temperature coefficient of -73 ppm/degrees C at 15.0 GHz. These ceramics are a good candidate for the expanding family of ultra-low temperature cofired ceramic technologies, for filter and substrate applications at the high-frequency range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据