4.5 Article

Biological Overlap of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Autism Spectrum Disorder: Evidence From Copy Number Variants

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.03.004

关键词

ADHD; ASD; pathway analysis; CNVs; comorbidity

资金

  1. Medical Research Council (UK)
  2. Baily Thomas Charitable Trust
  3. Wellcome Trust and Action Research
  4. University of Toronto McLaughlin Centre
  5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  6. Genome Canada
  7. MRC [G0801418, G1000632] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Medical Research Council [G0801418, G1000632, MR/L010305/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often co-occur and share genetic risks. The aim of this analysis was to determine more broadly whether ADHD and ASD share biological underpinnings. Method: We compared copy number variant (CNV) data from 727 children with ADHD and 5,081 population controls to data from 996 individuals with ASD and an independent set of 1,287 controls. Using pathway analyses, we investigated whether CNVs observed in individuals with ADHD have an impact on genes in the same biological pathways as on those observed in individuals with ASD. Results: The results suggest that the biological pathways affected by CNVs in ADHD overlap with those affected by CNVs in ASD more than would be expected by chance. Moreover, this was true even when specific CNV regions common to both disorders were excluded from the analysis. After correction for multiple testing, genes involved in 3 biological processes (nicotinic acetylcholine receptor signalling pathway, cell division, and response to drug) showed significant enrichment for case CNV hits in the combined ADHD and ASD sample. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate the presence of significant overlap of shared biological processes disrupted by large rare CNVs in children with these 2 neurodevelopmental conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据