4.5 Review

Pharmacologic Treatments for Pediatric Bipolar Disorder: A Review and Meta-Analysis

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.05.011

关键词

pediatric bipolar disorder; psychopharmacology; mania; depression; attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

资金

  1. Pediatric Psychopharmacology Council
  2. Bantam Books
  3. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), McNeil, Shire
  4. Eli Lilly and Co.
  5. Pfizer
  6. Shire
  7. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  8. Janssen
  9. McNeil
  10. Novartis
  11. Guilford Press
  12. Elmindo
  13. Next Wave Pharmaceuticals
  14. MGH Psychiatry Academy
  15. AstraZeneca
  16. Abbott
  17. Alza
  18. Bristol Myers Squibb
  19. Celltech
  20. Cephalon
  21. Esai
  22. Forest
  23. Glaxo
  24. Gliatech
  25. Merck
  26. National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (NARSAD)
  27. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
  28. New River
  29. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
  30. NIMH
  31. Noven
  32. Neurosearch
  33. Organon
  34. Otsuka
  35. Pharmacia
  36. Prechter Foundation
  37. The Stanley Foundation
  38. UCB Pharma
  39. Wyeth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: A growing body of literature has documented pediatric bipolar disorder to be a severely impairing form of psychopathology. However, concerns remain as to the inadequacy of the extant literature on its pharmacotherapy. Furthermore, treatment studies have not been systematically reviewed for treatment effects on core and associated symptoms. Thus, a systematic evaluation and synthesis of the available literature on the efficacy of antimanic pharmacotherapy for pediatric bipolar disorder on symptoms of mania, depression, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder was undertaken. Method: A systematic search was conducted through Pub Med from 1989 through 2010 for open-label and randomized controlled trials published in English on the pharmacotherapy of pediatric mania. Results: There have been 46 open-label (n = 29) and randomized (n = 17) clinical trials of antimanic agents in pediatric bipolar disorder encompassing 2,666 subjects that evaluated a range of therapeutic agents, including traditional mood stabilizers, other anticonvulsants, second-generation antipsychotics, and naturopathic compounds. This literature has documented that the available armamentarium has different levels of efficacy in the treatment of pediatric mania. Because all psychotropic classes are associated with important adverse effects, a careful risk-benefit analysis is warranted when initiating pharmacologic treatment with any of these compounds. In the limited data available, the effects of antimanic agents on depression and symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder have been, in general, modest. Few studies have evaluated the effects of antimanic agents in children younger than 10 years. Conclusions: A substantial body of scientific literature has evaluated the safety and efficacy of various medicines and drug classes in the treatment of mania in pediatric bipolar disorder. More work is needed to assess the safety and efficacy of psychotropic drugs in children younger than 10 years, to further evaluate the efficacy of naturopathic compounds, and to further evaluate the effects of antimanic treatments for the management of depression and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry, 2011;50(8):749-762.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据